A recurring theme in the blogosphere is the subject of healthy eating, and why it's so hard for "poor people" to eat well. Many of the arguments have to do with access to good food at a reasonable price. Others complain of minimal education about nutrition and food preparation. And yet others deal with the difficulty of preparing food in a poor person's living space.
The first argument has undisputed merit. There are areas of Los Angeles that have six+ liquor stores per square mile and no grocery stores. There are areas where the closest thing to a grocery store is a 7-11 or a Rite-Aid. Getting your hands on fresh vegetables and fruit if you live in these areas means you have to get up and go.
But you know, most of the inhabitants of these areas do get up and go. They are workers. They're not staying at home watching TV all day. Many of the households in these areas have more than two working adults per household and they don't have the kind of jobs you can do at home.
So each of those adults has to leave the neighborhood for work, and they can - and do: I've seen 'em - pick up food and take it on the bus home with them. So, if you want to buy actual food, you don't have to have a supermarket a block away from you.
The second argument, about poor education as to nutrition and food prep, also has merit. My problem with this one is a systemic one. We have a system of public education and our public schools pretty much all have kitchens, because kids are there all day and need to eat.
So I would think a really glaringly obvious way to address the nutrition/food prep education question is to put the kids in the school kitchen and, you know, teach them how to cook. If you're already paying food prep employees, the students are there, the equipment is there ... hello? Kids love to know stuff. They like to have skills. They like to contribute. Get 'em in the kitchen.
I find the last argument particularly irritating, because I myself have lived in marginal housing at various times and I managed to cook a meal here and there that was composed of more than tater tots and ketchup. But again, there's some merit. There are, unfortunately, states and cities in which landlords are not required to provide much more than four walls, a floor, and a roof.
However, in most places, a landlord also has to provide running water and electricity. He may not have to give you any appliances, but take a look at this:
- Whirlpool 14.4 cubic foot refrigerator with freezer: $409
- Presto 16" electric skillet with lid: $40
- Sanyo .7 cubic foot microwave oven: $65
There you go. That's all you really, really need to store food and prepare it. In fact, you could get by without the microwave. But with all three, you have basic food storage and appliances for just $514. (These prices, by the way, are all from Amazon as of 2010 - but could be matched on the ground pretty easily, and I doubt you'd be hard-pressed to find comparable prices now. Why Amazon? Because they DELIVER.)
But say you have a little more of a budget than that. The next three tools I'd choose, if I were starting from nothing:
- Avanti Bake & Broil toaster oven with 2-disk burner: $105
- Hamilton Beach 6-quart slow cooker: $27
- Lynns Saturn 2-quart saucepan with lid: $20
There you go; for another $152, you can cook pretty much anything except a Thanksgiving turkey. Of course, you still need some tools, and you don't really want to eat with your hands:
- Rachael Ray 6-piece nylon scrapers & servers set: $30
- Living Plus 6-piece cooking spoons set: $18
- Living Plus 6-piece kitchen tools set: $25
- Rada cook's utility knife: $7
- Rada serrated slicer: $6
- Oneida flatware, 20-pc service for 4: $40
- Corelle tableware, 16-pc service for 4: $30
All that for just $156! You now have a fully-equipped kitchen, including appliances that you can take with you when you get movin' on up, for $822. It's less than $70 a month to save that much in a year. $18 a week. For food independence. And these are tools that last, not stuff you'd need to replace constantly.
I think there is an idea, perhaps inflated by the class of people who can sit around bloviating on blogs through the haze of their post-graduate degrees (yes, I know this includes me), that equipping a kitchen is this gigantic, prohibitively expensive undertaking.
Y'all, that's because we watch HGTV, get the Williams-Sonoma catalog, and want the stainless-steel Sub-Zero and the pot filler and the custom cabinets. You don't need any cabinets to have a kitchen.
All you need is what you need. Teach your children well. If there's one thing I'm on board with, it's educational reform. But if for some moronic reason we can't actually give our kids kitchen skills anymore (even in my dirt-poor middle school, there was a Home Ec class or two), we can at least show them a breakdown like this and give them a copy of Eat This, Not That.
Everyone should be able to go out into America knowing that all you need to get by is a floor, four walls, a roof, running water, and electricity. You don't "need" a TV or, for that matter, a bed, a couch, or a table and chairs. If you've got the wherewithal to feed yourself you can save a ton of money, be more responsible with and for your health, and build skills that last a lifetime.
Save a little money. Put it in the bank and when you're going out on your own - whether it's after high school, after college, after a breakup - set yourself up not with toys, but with the tools to live a better life.